Showing posts with label children's writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children's writing. Show all posts

Friday, June 15, 2012

Should Your Characters Have Distinct Names?

No Name
No Name (Photo credit: Giant Ginkgo)


My novel-in-progress, The Power Club, features a small city full of teenaged characters with super-powers, six of whom belong to a team. Three of those characters are named Damon, Denise, and Danner.

I didn’t set out to create three prominent characters whose named begin with the letter D, but there they are, and in so doing, I’ve violated one of the cardinal rules for writing fiction: Give each character a distinct name.

Distinct names help readers keep your characters straight. They also help you, the writer. I confess that, while writing scenes featuring both characters, I’ve occasionally typed “Danner” instead of “Damon” and vice versa.

Members of my writing group have urged me to change Danner’s name. (Damon, the central character, is probably safe, and Denise is a girl, so she’s not likely to be confused with the other two.)

Yet there are compelling reasons to use similar character names:

  • Similar names reflect reality.  When I was in grade school, my small class included a Gregg, a Ginny and a Jenny, and two Steves. Even into adulthood, similar names abound: My brother and my cousin both married women named Christie. A writers group I joined last year had four members, two of whom were Kristi and Kristie. Even my present writers group includes Dennis and Dave and Kara and Kenand Christine, for another “K” sound. I've lost track of how many teachers I know named Jane.
  • Young fans have no trouble distinguishing rock band members with similar names.  Duran Duran famously had three unrelated members with the last name Taylor (John, Andy, and Roger). Styx featured Dennis DeYoung and James “JY” Young. The British folk rock band Fairport Convention included three Daves (Swarbrick, Pegg, and Mattacks) for several years.
  • Similar names crop up in respected works of fiction. The 1980s TV series Hill Street Blues, which pioneered the format of large ensemble casts, featured police officer Bobby Hill, who worked at the Hill Street police stationa coincidence which added to the cinéma vérité.

Some may point out that works of fiction should not reflect reality to such a degree that character names become distracting. They may also point out that it’s unlikely anyone would confuse a character with a street, and they would be right on both counts.

I’ve considered changing Danner’s name, but he’s such a strong personality whose name suits him. Early in the story we learn he doesn’t like being called “Danny”.  His masculine, adult-sounding name reflects his desire to tower over everyone, literally and figuratively.

Likewise, Damon and Denise are intended to be vivid characters whose personalities and powers leave the reader with no trouble telling them apart.

And the similarity in names provides a subtle touch of reality in a world dominated by an unreal situation, namely kids with powers. To give each character an obviously distinct name would risk coming across as artificial.

So, for now the names stay.

What do you think?  Do your strive to give your characters distinct names?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, May 4, 2012

Super-Powers Galore: Power Club Book Reading May 5 & 6, 2012

Photo: Google Maps. (Can't you tell by the little yellow guy?)

This post is a day early because it contains a special announcement.  See below.

If you happen to be in downtown Kansas City, MO, this weekend, stop by the “Gotham Arts Project” Crossroads Art District, 2100 Grand.  As part of the monthly “First Friday” event in Kansas City, the Gotham Arts Project is hosting an three-day “extravaganza” of “Art, Photography, Book signings, Jewelry, Sculpture, Entertainment , and more,” according to their flyer. 

One of the participants will be yours truly.

I’ll be present most of the weekend along with other members of my writing cohorts, the fabled Monday Night Writers Group.  We will be selling copies of the books we’ve published, including my comic book, Gold Dust.

I’ll also be reading from my novel-in-progress, The Power Club™ at 2 p.m. both Saturday and Sunday.

Why am I reading from a book that hasn’t been published yet?  The same three reasons you should do public readings from your own works-in-progress:

Experience.  The more experience you have reading your work in public, the better you’ll get.  When your book is finally published, you'll be rarin' to go!

Building an audience.  Reading in public attracts potential readers to your work.  Ideally, they will fall in love with your characters, your writing style, or even you (but not in a stalker kind of way), and they will look forward to your book when it’s published.   

Even if the audience is only mildly interested, the title of your book or your name may jog their memory later, prompting them to give your work a second look.

Network, network, network.  Writers learn from other writers.  We learn by watching them do readings.  We learn by interacting with them.  We learn from just being around places where writing is celebrated. 

But won’t readers be disappointed if they like your book and can’t buy it yet? 

That’s why you have a blog.  (You do have a blog, right?)  That's why you do social media networking such as Facebook and Twitter.  So you can keep potential readers informed with updates and maybe even entice them further with free chapters of your work-in-progress.

So drop by 2100 Grand this weekend and see what writers do when they’re not, well, writing.

The Gotham Arts Project's schedule:
May 4, 6-9:30 p.m.: First Friday activities
May 5, 10 a.m.-4 p.m.: Children's reading (2 p.m.), music, dance, authors' readings
May 6, 12 noon-4 p.m.: Children's reading (2 p.m.), music, dance, authors' readings. [Update: The Sunday readings have been cancelled.]

A percentage of sales will be donated to Kansas City Hospice.

What Made the Beatles Unique? A Personal Perspective

    Photo by Fedor on Unsplash   One of the social media groups I frequent posed a thought-provoking post on the Beatles. The post was acco...